I can only imagine how President Trump would have handled the three rogue beavers who chopped down America’s beloved cherry trees along the Tidal Basin.
The National Cherry Blossom Festival is underway in Washington, D.C. Some 3,700 cherry trees, given to America by the Japanese in 1912, are in full bloom.
I lived in the Washington, D.C. region for nearly eight years and greatly enjoyed hosting family and friends to enjoy that festival every year.
Back in 1999, however, three beaver vandals were chewing down cherry trees faster than you can say “timber!”
Washington bureaucrats and advocacy groups responded to the crisis in their usual convoluted ways.
PETA was first out of the gate with a reasonable solution: its spokesperson said it’s best to trap the beavers in the most humane way possible and relocate them.
No sooner was PETA’s idea floated than wildlife experts began crawling out of the woodwork.
One expert warned that it would be tragic to separate the three beavers, since they’re likely from the same family; one beaver is a yearling, she said, and beavers should stay with mom and dad until the age of two.
Another expert said you can’t move beavers to a new colony, anyway, because the new colony — beavers are Republican? — would reject the freeloaders.
A third wildlife expert said that all things considered, the most humane thing to do might be to just kill the buggers.
Boy, did the public react negatively to that suggestion. That’s because beavers are really cute.
Heck, if they looked more like their pointy-nosed cousins — rats — even PETA might ditch their principles to have those varmints whacked.
But PETA wanted nothing to do with euthanizing beavers. A spokesperson said they should leave the beavers alone — so what if they created a gigantic cherry tree dam.
I can only imagine how Trump would handle the situation if it happened now.
Copyright 2025 Tom Purcell, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.